Libre Franklin
by Impallari Type

Thin Italic 100

Extra-Light Italic 200

Light Italic 300

Regular Italic 400

Medium Italic 500

Semi-Bold Italic 600

Bold Italic 700

ExtraBold Italic 800

Black Italic 900

Description

Libre Franklin is an interpretation and expansion of the classic Franklin Gothic typeface. It’s a versatile sans-serif, suitable for both long-form text and headlines. At large sizes, the distinctive rounded corners of the characters become apparent.

Designed by

Impallari Type

Category

Sans-Serif

No. of styles

18

Characters

Aa
Bb
Cc
Dd
Ee
Ff
Gg
Hh
Ii
Jj
Kk
Ll
Mm
Nn
Oo
Pp
Qq
Rr
Ss
Tt
Uu
Vv
Ww
Xx
Yy
Zz
Åå
Ææ
Çç
Éé
Øø
Ññ
Üü
Žž
1234567890
‘¿?’
“!”
- – —
(&)
[*]
{@}
€£¥$¢
:;,.
<>+÷×=

Words

Questography

Havana Plywood

qualification

Château d’Yquem

hamburgevontpids

Högertrafikomläggningen

difficult waffles

Headlines

Brawny gods just flocked up to quiz and vex him

100

Amazingly few discotheques provide jukeboxes

200

Why shouldn’t a quixotic Kazakh vampire jog barefoot?

300

Grumpy wizards make a toxic brew for the jovial queen

400

Jackie will budget for the most expensive zoology equipment

500

Monsieur Jack, vous dactylographiez bien mieux que votre ami Wolf

600

Jeg begynte å fortære en sandwich mens jeg kjørte taxi på vei til quiz

700

Victor jagt zwölf Boxkämpfer quer über den großen Sylter Deich

800

Gazeta publica hoje no jornal uma breve nota de faxina na quermesse

900

Italic headlines

Brawny gods just flocked up to quiz and vex him

100

Amazingly few discotheques provide jukeboxes

200

Why shouldn’t a quixotic Kazakh vampire jog barefoot?

300

Grumpy wizards make a toxic brew for the jovial queen

400

Jackie will budget for the most expensive zoology equipment

500

Monsieur Jack, vous dactylographiez bien mieux que votre ami Wolf

600

Jeg begynte å fortære en sandwich mens jeg kjørte taxi på vei til quiz

700

Victor jagt zwölf Boxkämpfer quer über den großen Sylter Deich

800

Gazeta publica hoje no jornal uma breve nota de faxina na quermesse

900

Paragraphs

font-weight: 300

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

Paragraphs

font-weight: 400

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

Paragraphs

font-weight: 500

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

But how could we fail to see that there is an infinite regress here—if we do not accept, as Kantian and post-Kantian philosophies do, a “supersensible” domain of freedom, outside of the world and its physical determinisms? According to them, the free sub­ject is an absolute origin, a first agent capable of creating first causes, who initiates new causal chains ex nihilo, independent of the rest of the world. —Henri Atlan, Is Science Inhuman?

Figures

A123

Superscripts: 'sups'

Ordinals

font-feature-settings: 'ordn';

3a 3a
4o 4o

Special Characters and Symbols

&para;

§

&sect;

&dagger;

&Dagger;

Recommended Pairings for Libre Franklin

Out to
Lunch!
Eric
Dolphy

Out to Lunch stands as Eric Dolphy’s magnum opus, an absolute pinnacle of avant-garde jazz in any form or era. Its rhythmic complexity was perhaps unrivaled since Dave Brubeck’s Time Out, and its five Dolphy originals—the jarring Monk tribute “Hat and Beard,” the aptly titled “Something Sweet, Something Tender,” the weirdly jaunty flute showcase “Gazzelloni,” the militaristic title track, the drunken lurch of “Straight Up and Down”—were a perfect balance of structured frameworks, carefully calibrated timbres, and generous individual freedom. — AllMusic Review by Steve Huey

Paired with Source Serif Pro